I know we need agression, bur this seems overly agressive. Expecting a response to a weak accusation that was more likely to be part of the spam phase is more than I'd say is generally warranted. So you're making me look at you woth that.well, yeah, wouldn't a person want to seem "pretty innocent" if they took the princess? I mean seems to me they wouldn't want too much attention and the fact that he was online for a while after I posted that vote and he never responded, that's what's got me. I would like to hear from baka before I consider unvoting because his silence seems fishy to me.@Damia, okay so it was a vote to get things rolling. Bakas post seemed pretty innocent to me though.
Abduln, you mentioned that Baka's post seemed "pretty innocent" (to use your words). I must admit I find your choice of words interesring. If you had said you didn't understand what Damia saw in Baka's post and asked in that regards, I wouldn't have noticed it. But your choice of saying Baka's post seemed innocent makes it seem like you're defending Baka when the attack, if it can be called that, is very weak. So that's just one thing I'm noticing.
@Damia , there's being and acting "pretty innocent" in a way and then there's (what I see) to be Baka using the opportunity to comment on mine and Kalegs late arrival to the game. That short into the game there's no way (again, just my thoughts) that Baka had any hard ground to suspect Kaleg and I of being scum, it's typical Mafia D1 banter. (I'm not defending you @Baka btw)
@Kaleg Nar, Great observation. Like I said, so far, harmless joke. Also, you just acknowledged yourself it was a weak accusation likely part of the spam phase, so do you see how it appeared as a joke to me?
Right now I'm a bit suspicious of Sharpe, not really contributing anything to the chat. What are your thoughts?
Also bam, flying right underneath the radar...